Quantcast
Channel: Why doesn't the definition of dependence require that one can expresses each vector in terms of the others? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

Answer by Michael Hardy for Why doesn't the definition of dependence require that one can expresses each vector in terms of the others?

$
0
0

To say that one of the vectors is a linear combination of the others singles out a vector to play a different role from the others. And it's possible that there are some among them that are not linear combinations of the others, but also some that are.

The point of the conventional definition is to make a statement in which none of the vectors plays a role different from the roles of the others, at least in the statement of the definition.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>